Our firm ensures that our clients protect, understand, and appropriately monetize all types of intellectual property. We take a holistic approach to intellectual property matters to ensure that businesses get the most value out of their intellectual property portfolios.
Our philosophy is to first ensure our clients have a deep and total understanding of the landscape of available intellectual property protections, both to determine value and protection strategies for current intellectual property, as well as to ensure proper positioning for growth. Our practice includes the protection and evaluation of copyright, trademark, trade secret, hull and decking features associated with vessel protection filings, as well as other protections associated with intellectual property.
When issues arise, we routinely assist in resolving bet-the-company intellectual property disputes associated with patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and vessel protection act litigation.
Our firm regularly represents clients in a variety of intellectual property matters, providing representation to our clients in obtaining trademark, copyright, and trade secret protections. We represent health care, manufacturing, financial services, security, technology, shared ownership, consumer products, educational services, and public relations industry sector clients in obtaining trademark and copyright registrations, as well as vessel protection act registrations, and in managing their intellectual property portfolios.
Our firm also represents clients in a wide range of intellectual property disputes, including advising a Fortune 100 pharmaceutical company in a patent litigation in the Middle District of Florida, the representation of a semiconductor manufacturer in patent litigation in the Central District of California, representation of a manufacturer in patent litigation in the District of Arizona, representation of a technology services company in a patent litigation in the Middle District of Florida, as well as negotiating favorable resolution in a number of pre-litigation disputes involving allegations of patent infringement.
Other examples include representation of an educational service provider in two related litigations in the Northern District of Florida involving a number of complex copyright and trade secret issues, the representation of a real estate company in copyright litigation in the Middle District of Florida involving allegations of infringing use of a developer's source code, the representation of a shared ownership company in litigation in the Middle District of Florida involving the theft and resale of corporate trade secrets by a former employee, and the representation of a manufacturer in a complex trademark dispute in the Southern District of New York.